Dianna Ramirez is a full time student at Northern Virginia
Community College, majoring in Science. She has spent the past few weeks
researching on her discourse: The Media’s Influence Against Muslims.
Carlos Latuff's political cartoon created September 23, 2012. |
On the morning of September 11, 2001, the United States of
America was attacked by a couple of airplane hijackers who claimed to have done
what the their “God” had demanded them to do.
Unfortunately, these terrorist claimed to belong to the Muslim
religion.
This horrendous act stained the public’s perception towards
the Muslim religion and its followers.
The world seemed to have grown a hatred towards these innocent people.
The media was allowed to take control over the situation that was growing
amongst the public and the Muslims.
In a peer- reviewed article named (RE) presenting: Muslims on
North American Television, published by Amir Hussain, the author finds in his
research that media is far more interested in receiving high ratings and profits,
than they are interested in investigative journalism. This statement should tell you that the whole
truth is not important to the media, if it is not bringing any money in.
Muslims became an easy target after the tragedy of 9/11. Discrimination against this minority group
was allowed when the media began to publish pieces that mocked this religion.
The fact that the media was the one doing all of the teasing and bullying
against this group of people, it seemed normal to haze them and call it Freedom
of Speech. On September 23, 2012, satirist
Carlos Latuff posted the political cartoon shown above. In this cartoon, Latuff points out that the
media allowed the bad mouthing towards Muslims but not towards other
groups. In the cartoon, it seems almost
unholy to mock the Jewish religion when the cartoonist draws out an object that
resembles their beliefs.
Muslim activists like Anjem Choudary, are constantly being
slammed because they going against what the media posts and defend their
religion. In one particular article, Choudary is allowed an opposing view to be
published on USA Today’s newspaper. He explains why the Charlie Hebdo shooting
may have happened. He mentions how the terrorist were fed up of the constant
disrespect they received from the satirists from that publication company. He mentions how it is a law in their religion
to defend their prophet by any means.
Although I am not justifying the massacre, I would like to point out
that people do get fed up of being looked down upon.
The media has the power to control what is being said, when
the information gets to the public, and how it gets out to the public. They
have the control in saying what is wrong and what is okay to look down upon.
They have the power to influence their followers to do anything they want them
to do. Australian journalist Liz Jackson wrote the article “Images of Islam in
US Media and Their Educational Implications”.
In this article Jackson mentions a heart wrenching story about a young boy who is tried for the murder of another child of which he was play wrestling
with. This young boy explained that he was only playing the same game that the
people on television were playing.
There are many cases like this that link back to the
media. Yet, the media is constantly
praised and suggested to be used amongst young children and their learning environment. Muslims have not been the only victims of
falsified stories created by the media.
More recent stories that have made headlines for weeks upon weeks, like
the Ebola cases and how the entire human race could be wiped out within a
matter of weeks. Or even the police
brutality cases in Missouri, New York, and Maryland. Because we will never be able
to experience every story in person, the media will always have the advantage
of tweaking them to their likings to simply… make more money.
I do not suggest that we cut off all use of media. I simply want to raise awareness; you cannot
believe everything you hear.
No comments:
Post a Comment